Threat-Driven Offensive Security Testing
Simulating real-world attacks is the best way to test your defenses against motivated adversaries.
Who this is for
Engineering and security teams preparing for a release, a customer security review, or a procurement questionnaire — and anyone who needs to know what an attacker could actually reach.
Methodology
What We Test
We focus on concrete attack surfaces that matter to real attackers. External and internal application attack surfaces, including authentication bypass, authorization flaws, and injection vulnerabilities. Cloud identity and trust boundaries—IAM privilege escalation, cross-tenant access, and service account abuse. API abuse paths and business logic weaknesses that automated scanners miss. AI/LLM abuse scenarios including prompt injection, training data exposure, and model manipulation. IoT, firmware, and embedded system entry points through wireless protocols, hardware interfaces, and supply chain vectors. Lateral movement and privilege escalation paths across networks, containers, and cloud environments.
How We Test
Our methodology starts from attacker-accessible entry points, not theoretical vulnerabilities. We chain vulnerabilities instead of reporting isolated findings—a SQL injection becomes a path to credential theft, which enables lateral movement, which leads to domain compromise. We pivot across systems, identities, and trust boundaries, validating how attackers would actually navigate your environment. Every finding is validated for exploitability, not just theoretical risk. We escalate impact until meaningful control or data access is achieved, demonstrating real-world consequences.
Deliverables
You receive exploit chains and attack paths, not just vulnerability lists. Each finding includes clear impact assessment tied to attacker objectives—what an attacker can actually achieve, not just what a scanner detected. Reproduction steps engineering teams can follow, with proof-of-concept code or detailed walkthroughs. Prioritized remediation guidance based on real risk, not CVSS scores. Executive-level summary alongside deep technical detail, enabling both strategic decisions and tactical fixes.
How an engagement runs
-
Scope & authorisation
We agree exactly what is in scope, what is explicitly out, and the conditions under which we stop. Nothing starts without written authorisation from someone able to give it. NDA first if you want one.
-
Access & prerequisites
We tell you up front what we need — test accounts at each privilege level, a non-production environment where that applies, documentation, and a named technical contact. Missing prerequisites are the usual reason assessments slip.
-
Reconnaissance & threat modelling
We map the real attack surface and decide which paths are worth the time, based on how your system is actually built rather than a generic checklist.
-
Manual testing & validated exploitation
Testing is hands-on. Findings are reproduced before they are written up, so you are not sent unverified scanner output. Critical issues are raised as soon as we confirm them rather than held for the report.
-
Report & walkthrough
You get an executive summary your board can read and technical detail your engineers can act on — including reproduction steps, what we tested that held, and what was out of scope. We walk your team through it.
-
Retest
Once you have fixed the findings we retest them and confirm in writing what is closed. Retest scope and window are agreed in your scope document before the engagement begins.
Toolkit
- Cobalt Strike
- Sliver
- BloodHound
- Custom Malware
