Web Application Pentesting

Comprehensive assessment of web apps focusing on OWASP Top 10, business logic, and API flaws.

Web Application Pentesting

What We Test

  • Authentication, Session Management, and Access Control
  • Injection flaws (SQLi, XSS, SSTI, Command Injection)
  • Business Logic vulnerabilities and workflow bypasses
  • Client-side security and data exposure
  • Server-side misconfigurations and dependency vulnerabilities
  • Payment gateway and sensitive data handling

How We Test

We combine manual in-depth testing with automated scanning. We map the entire application logic, fuzz input fields, manipulate requests (Burp Suite), and craft custom exploit scripts to validate vulnerabilities. We focus on chaining minor issues to achieve critical impact.

What You Receive

  • Detailed report with reproduction steps and POCs
  • Risk rating based on real-world impact
  • Specific code-level remediation advice
  • Executive summary for stakeholders

Network Pentesting

External and internal infrastructure testing to identify open ports, weak services, and lateral movement paths.

Network Pentesting

What We Test

  • External Perimeter (Public IP space)
  • Internal Network (Workstations, Servers, Printers)
  • Active Directory (AD) and Domain Controllers
  • Network Devices (Firewalls, Routers, Switches)
  • VPN and Remote Access endpoints
  • Wireless Networks (Wi-Fi)

How We Test

External: We simulate an outsider trying to breach the perimeter. Internal: We simulate a malicious insider or compromised host. We perform port scanning, service enumeration, exploit unpatched services, and attempt lateral movement and privilege escalation (e.g., Kerberoasting, LLMNR poisoning).

What You Receive

  • Comprehensive list of open ports and services
  • Verified vulnerabilities with evidence
  • Attack path visualization (from entry to Domain Admin)
  • Prioritized patch and configuration management plan

Mobile Application Pentesting

In-depth security analysis of iOS and Android applications, binary protections, and API backends.

Mobile Application Pentesting

What We Test

  • iOS and Android application binaries (IPA/APK)
  • Insecure data storage (Keychain, Keystore, Logs, DBs)
  • Communication security (Certificate Pinning, SSL/TLS)
  • Runtime manipulation and jailbreak/root detection
  • Backend API vulnerabilities (Authentication, Logic)
  • Reverse engineering resistance and obfuscation

How We Test

We use static analysis (SAST) to review code and configs, and dynamic analysis (DAST) using tools like Frida and Objection to hook into running processes, bypass checks, and tamper with logic. We intercept traffic to test the API layer thoroughly.

What You Receive

  • Findings on binary, data, and network security
  • Guidance on implementing secure storage and comms
  • Recommendations for hardening against tampering
  • Verification of fixes for app store compliance

AI & LLM Security

Prompt injection, training data exposure, and model manipulation testing.

AI & LLM Security

What We Test

  • Prompt injection and instruction override paths
  • Training data exposure and sensitive data leakage
  • Model output manipulation and response poisoning
  • Plugin, tool, and agent integration abuse
  • Authentication, authorization, and tenant isolation flaws
  • Insecure model configuration and deployment weaknesses

How We Test

We start from attacker-controlled inputs, not trusted prompts. We actively bypass safety controls and alignment assumptions. We chain prompt abuse with application and API flaws. We validate real data access and execution impact. We escalate from model misuse to application or account compromise.

What You Receive

  • Exploitable attack paths, not theoretical risks
  • Clear reproduction steps with payload examples
  • Impact assessment tied to data access or control
  • Remediation guidance aligned to exploit paths

Cloud Security

IAM privilege escalation, storage misconfigurations, and container escape testing.

Cloud Security

What We Test

  • IAM roles, policies, and privilege escalation paths
  • S3 buckets, storage blobs, and data exposure risks
  • Serverless functions (Lambda/Azure Functions) and event triggers
  • Kubernetes clusters (EKS/AKS/GKE) and container escape vectors
  • VPC peering, security groups, and network segmentation
  • CI/CD pipelines and infrastructure-as-code (IaC) flaws

How We Test

We don't just run CSPM scans. We simulate compromised instances to test lateral movement. We attempt to pivot from public assets to internal resources using metadata services and weak permissions. We validate if alerts trigger on critical actions.

What You Receive

  • Visual attack graph showing movement across services
  • Terraform/CLI scripts to reproduce findings
  • Impact analysis on data confidentiality and integrity
  • Hardening guides for IAM and orchestration

IoT & Drone Security

Wireless protocol testing, firmware analysis, and device compromise.

IoT & Drone Security

What We Test

  • Wireless protocols (Zigbee, BLE, LoRa, Wi-Fi)
  • Hardware interfaces (UART, JTAG, SPI, I2C)
  • Firmware extraction, encryption, and hardcoded secrets
  • Mobile companion apps and cloud API backends
  • GPS/GNSS signal integrity and spoofing resilience
  • Drone flight controller command injection

How We Test

We perform physical teardowns to access debug ports. We sniff and replay radio signals to hijack control. We reverse engineer firmware binaries to find logic flaws and private keys. We assess resistance to physical tampering and signal jamming.

What You Receive

  • Hardware revision recommendations
  • Firmware patch strategies and secure boot guidance
  • Signal protection and encryption protocols
  • Demonstration of device takeover or data extraction

Automotive Security

CAN bus attacks, ECU vulnerabilities, and wireless key fob exploitation.

Automotive Security

What We Test

  • In-Vehicle Infotainment (IVI) systems and connectivity
  • CAN bus messaging and gateway isolation
  • ECU firmware and diagnostic services (UDS)
  • Keyless entry systems (RF/NFC) and immobilizers
  • Telematics Control Units (TCU) and cellular interfaces
  • V2X (Vehicle-to-Everything) communication

How We Test

We connect directly to OBD-II and internal buses to fuzz ECU communication. We analyze RF signals for replay or relay attacks. We isolate ECUs to test firmware updates and boot security. We validate separation between safety-critical and infotainment domains.

What You Receive

  • Safety-critical vulnerability assessment (ISO 21434 context)
  • CAN bus message injection proofs
  • Architecture improvements for domain isolation
  • Secure boot and update mechanism validation

Threat-Driven Offensive Security Testing

Adversarial testing driven by attacker objectives, not compliance checklists.

What We Test

We focus on concrete attack surfaces that matter to real attackers. External and internal application attack surfaces, including authentication bypass, authorization flaws, and injection vulnerabilities. Cloud identity and trust boundaries—IAM privilege escalation, cross-tenant access, and service account abuse. API abuse paths and business logic weaknesses that automated scanners miss. AI/LLM abuse scenarios including prompt injection, training data exposure, and model manipulation. IoT, firmware, and embedded system entry points through wireless protocols, hardware interfaces, and supply chain vectors. Lateral movement and privilege escalation paths across networks, containers, and cloud environments.

How We Test

Our methodology starts from attacker-accessible entry points, not theoretical vulnerabilities. We chain vulnerabilities instead of reporting isolated findings—a SQL injection becomes a path to credential theft, which enables lateral movement, which leads to domain compromise. We pivot across systems, identities, and trust boundaries, validating how attackers would actually navigate your environment. Every finding is validated for exploitability, not just theoretical risk. We escalate impact until meaningful control or data access is achieved, demonstrating real-world consequences.

Deliverables

You receive exploit chains and attack paths, not just vulnerability lists. Each finding includes clear impact assessment tied to attacker objectives—what an attacker can actually achieve, not just what a scanner detected. Reproduction steps engineering teams can follow, with proof-of-concept code or detailed walkthroughs. Prioritized remediation guidance based on real risk, not CVSS scores. Executive-level summary alongside deep technical detail, enabling both strategic decisions and tactical fixes.

Why It Matters

This approach reduces false sense of security from checklist testing. It helps teams understand how systems actually fail under attack, not just which boxes remain unchecked. It enables prioritization based on real-world risk, focusing remediation efforts where they matter most. Most importantly, it improves security posture against motivated attackers, not scanners.

Hardware & Kernel Security

Low-level system attack surface testing.

Hardware & Kernel Security

What We Test

  • Secure Boot chain of trust and TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)
  • Kernel drivers, modules, and privilege levels
  • Memory protections (ASLR, DEP/NX, SMEP/SMAP)
  • Side-channel leakage (Power analysis, Timing attacks)
  • Hardware debug ports and fuse configurations
  • DMA (Direct Memory Access) attacks

How We Test

We use fault injection (glitching) to bypass security checks. We fuzz kernel drivers to find corruption primitives. We develop custom shellcode to demonstrate ring-0 execution. We analyze power traces to extract cryptographic keys.

What You Receive

  • Proof-of-Concept (PoC) exploits for local escalation
  • Driver hardening patches and recommendations
  • Hardware design changes to mitigate side-channels
  • Secure boot configuration fixes

API Security

Authentication bypass, injection flaws, and business logic abuse testing.

API Security

What We Test

  • REST, GraphQL, and gRPC endpoints
  • Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA/IDOR)
  • Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA)
  • Rate limiting and resource quotas
  • JWT/OAuth/OIDC implementation flaws
  • Mass assignment and excessive data exposure

How We Test

We manually map business logic to find authorization gaps automated scanners miss. We attempt to harvest data by iterating IDs (BOLA). We test token validity, scoping, and refresh flows. We fuzz inputs for injection and logic errors specific to your API schema.

What You Receive

  • Postman/Curl collections to reproduce exploits
  • Code-level remediation for authorization logic
  • Gateway and WAF configuration tuning
  • Impact analysis on user data and privacy

SOC Monitoring

24/7 threat detection, incident response, and threat hunting.

SOC Monitoring

What We Test & Monitor

  • 24/7 Threat Detection and Event Correlation
  • Detection Rule Efficacy and Coverage (MITRE ATT&CK)
  • Alert Fatigue and False Positive Reduction
  • Incident Response Time and Playbook Execution
  • Log Source Completeness and Integrity
  • SIEM Configuration and Health

How We Operate

We don't just watch screens. We perform proactive threat hunting to find hidden adversaries. We run Purple Team exercises to validate detection rules against real attack techniques. We constantly tune logic to filter noise and surface high-fidelity signals.

What You Receive

  • Real-time alerting on confirmed threats
  • Monthly executive reports on security posture
  • Detection gap analysis and improvement roadmap
  • Incident analysis and root cause reports

Security Audits & Architecture Reviews

Attack-informed security reviews focused on exploitability, not compliance checklists.

Security Audits & Architecture Reviews

What We Test

  • Security architecture and trust boundaries across applications and cloud environments
  • Identity, authentication, and authorization flows
  • Configuration drift and insecure design assumptions
  • Privilege models and access paths attackers would abuse
  • Logging, monitoring, and detection gaps relevant to real attack paths

How We Test

  • Review architecture from an attacker's perspective
  • Trace realistic attack paths across systems and identities
  • Validate whether controls actually prevent exploitation
  • Correlate findings with real-world exploitation techniques
  • Focus on abuse scenarios instead of control presence

What You Receive

  • Architectural risk assessment tied to attacker impact
  • Identified trust boundary and privilege escalation issues
  • Practical remediation guidance based on exploitability
  • Prioritized findings grounded in real risk
  • Executive summary plus deep technical detail

Why It Matters

  • Prevents false confidence from compliant-but-exploitable systems
  • Identifies systemic weaknesses before incidents occur
  • Helps teams fix root causes, not isolated issues
  • Bridges the gap between audits and offensive testing

Infrastructure Attack Surface Security

Cloud, on-prem, and hybrid infrastructure attack surface testing focused on exploitability.

Infrastructure Attack Surface Security

What We Test

  • Cloud, on-prem, and hybrid infrastructure attack surfaces
  • Identity, access paths, and privilege boundaries
  • Network segmentation and trust zones
  • Misconfigurations enabling lateral movement

How We Test

  • Enumerate infrastructure from attacker entry points
  • Trace trust relationships across environments
  • Validate exploitability of misconfigurations
  • Chain weaknesses into real attack paths

What You Receive

  • Clear view of attacker movement through infrastructure
  • Exploitable paths tied to business impact
  • Prioritized remediation guidance
  • Focus on breaking attack chains

Why It Matters

  • Prevents breaches caused by exposed infrastructure
  • Reduces blast radius after initial access
  • Improves resilience against real intrusions

Exploit-Driven Secure Code Review

Code review focused on exploitable vulnerabilities and business logic abuse, not style.

Exploit-Driven Secure Code Review

What We Test

  • Authentication and authorization code paths
  • Input handling and trust boundaries
  • Business logic abuse scenarios
  • High-risk patterns leading to exploit chains

How We Test

  • Follow attacker-controlled execution paths
  • Correlate code flaws with runtime behavior
  • Focus on abuse, not style or linting
  • Validate exploitability in context

What You Receive

  • Exploitable findings, not theoretical issues
  • Clear proof of abuse scenarios
  • Actionable remediation for developers
  • Reduced false positives

Why It Matters

  • Stops vulnerabilities before production
  • Catches logic flaws scanners miss
  • Aligns fixes with real attacker techniques

SCADA & Manufacturing Security

Specialized testing for OT/ICS environments, PLCs, HMIs, and industrial protocols.

SCADA & Manufacturing Security

What We Test

  • SCADA systems, HMIs (Human-Machine Interfaces), and PLCs
  • Industrial protocols (Modbus, DNP3, BACnet, OPC UA)
  • OT/IT network segmentation and air gaps
  • Historian databases and engineering workstations
  • Wireless connectivity in plant environments
  • Embedded web servers and management interfaces

How We Test

We prioritize safety and operational continuity. We perform passive network analysis to map assets and protocols without disrupting processes. We test non-critical environments or replicas for active exploitation. We validate segmentation controls and assess physical security risks.

What You Receive

  • Network topology map and asset inventory
  • Identification of insecure protocols and weak auth
  • Segmentation verification report
  • Hardening guide for OT specific equipment

MCP Pentesting

Security assessment of Model Context Protocol (MCP) implementations, agent-tool orchestration, and context integrity.

MCP Pentesting

What We Test

  • MCP Server and Client implementations
  • Tool definitions, schemas, and metadata integrity
  • Context injection and manipulation vectors
  • Agent-tool authorization and permission scoping
  • Data leakage via context windows
  • Protocol-level authentication and encryption

How We Test

We analyze the MCP architecture to identify trust boundaries. We perform "tool poisoning" attacks to see if malicious tools can mislead agents. We fuzz protocol messages to find parsing errors. We test if agents can be coerced into taking unauthorized actions via manipulated context.

What You Receive

  • Vulnerability report specific to MCP architecture
  • Proof of Context Injection or Tool Poisoning
  • Recommendations for secure agent design
  • Hardening guidelines for tool schemas
Methodology

Our Proven Approach

Our proprietary offensive security methodology goes beyond standard testing to model realistic advanced persistent threats.

01

Discover

Identify attacker-accessible entry points and trust assumptions. We map the full attack surface including undocumented assets and shadow IT.

  • OSINT & Reconnaissance
  • Asset Discovery & Enumeration
  • Service Identification
02

Study

Analyze architecture, data flows, and trust boundaries. We focus on understanding business logic and potential abuse scenarios.

  • Threat Modeling
  • Architecture Review
  • Logic Flow Analysis
03

Test

Actively challenge controls and validate exploitability. We confirm the presence of vulnerabilities through safe exploitation.

  • Vulnerability Scanning
  • Manual Exploitation
  • Payload Crafting
04

Risk Chain

Chain weaknesses into real attack paths to escalate privileges. We connect minor issues to demonstrate critical impact.

  • Attack Chaining
  • Lateral Movement
  • Privilege Escalation
05

Prove

Demonstrate real-world impact through controlled exploitation. We show executive impact like data loss or system takeover.

  • Data Exfiltration (Simulated)
  • Access Demonstration
  • Impact Analysis
06

Secure

Prioritize remediation based on exploitability and impact. We provide actionable fixes and verify remediation.

  • Remediation Guidance
  • Retesting & Verification
  • Strategic Recommendations

Why DSTRPS™ Works

  • Models adversarial behavior, not compliance checklists
  • Exposes systemic weaknesses hidden in complex logic
  • Produces reproducible findings engineering teams can fix
  • Aligns security spend with actual business risk

The Difference

Traditional Pentest DSTRPS™ Assessment
Scanner-dependent Research-driven
Isolated findings Chained kill-chains
Compliance focus Exploitability focus
PDF Report Actionable roadmap

Ready to assess your security?

Discuss your security testing requirements.

Request Assessment

No obligation. Typical response time: 1 business day.

Contact Us